Publications & Resources

A 45-year-old man’s nerve damage after a root canal led to a lawsuit against the endodontist for negligence in anesthesia administration. This case underscores the importance of thorough documentation and informed consent in dental procedures.

MLMIC experts investigate a case in which informed consent and surgeon responsibility were lacking, highlighting the critical need for doctors to prioritize patient safety over patient insistence on procedures.

MLMIC’s latest case study highlights the serious risks of skipping pre-procedure testing due to patient refusal and emphasizes the importance of clear documentation and following standard care protocols to help prevent complications.

MLMIC experts dive into a case that resulted in a settlement after a 39-year-old man with severe chest pain was misdiagnosed in the emergency department and discharged, only to suffer a fatal cardiac arrest from an undiagnosed aortic dissection later that evening.

MLMIC experts reveal how an extensive and costly dental treatment plan, combined with poor documentation and unclear consent, resulted in a mandibular fracture and a substantial settlement. This case underscores the critical need for clear communication and thorough documentation to avoid such costly outcomes.

A young patient with juvenile arthritis experienced permanent peripheral vision loss after her ophthalmologist failed to identify early signs of glaucoma. Despite her regular follow-ups, the delayed diagnosis resulted in severe complications, leading to a significant malpractice settlement.

A delayed cancer diagnosis led to severe consequences for a 46-year-old patient. Despite repeated visits, crucial testing was postponed, resulting in metastasis and an early settlement.

In this case study, MLMIC explores a malpractice case where a 38-year-old man’s back pain and addiction were mishandled, resulting in a tragic outcome.

In this case study, MLMIC highlights how diagnostic delays can occur despite multiple evaluations. A 14-year-old was misdiagnosed with epididymitis rather than left testicular torsion, leading to a lawsuit and loss of the testicle.

MLMIC’s Tammie Smeltz shares a case study that highlights the importance of proper documentation and the risks of “curbside consultations” for sulfa allergies.